Ms. Frizzle is Making a Comeback!

The Magic School Bus book were surely some of my first introductions to science. And the fabulous outfits of the title character Ms. Frizzle are something I have longed to replicate in my own life (see photo below for my Parasitology class).

And due to their presence and popularity on Netflix, a reboot is likely to happen soon!

Check it out over at the Nerdist!

c179fa39f11a3b175cbcd228c13f3807fullsizeoutput_13

Sharing words from a federal scientist.

Today is my 3rd anniversary as a federal civil servant. I work as a biologist and decision analyst for an environmental conservation agency. To become qualified to do this work, I earned a bachelor’s degree, a master’s degree, a doctorate, and two years of post-doctoral training. Respectively, that equals 14 years of higher education. And I am not unique. Rather, I’m daft compared to my colleagues. They’ve got the book-smarts plus the experience and institutional knowledge that is only gained through time in Service. I feel so very lucky to be surrounded by such highly-qualified, intelligent, and dedicated professionals.
Today should be a proud day. A day of celebration. Instead, I feel sick. And demoralized. Gag orders on federal scientists? Government professionals being targeted for their work on climate change? That’s me. That’s my colleagues. We are the “swamp” that our new president keeps referring to, and I am disgusted and offended by his reference to our contribution and commitment to Public Service. Though, as an ecologist, I can’t help but point out that swamps are highly productive and important ecosystems, and draining them leads to disasters like Katrina… a point totally lost on our president.
And then there’s the issue of jobs. Our new president says he wants to bring back jobs. Which makes me wonder, do our jobs not count? Does the American public truly believe that 3 million civil servants deserve to be treated as though we’re contestants on some reality show? The myth of the “lazy, entitled” federal employee is just that. A myth. Because we exist in a consistently under-funded, not-for-profit workplace, we must do the work of two or three people to meet our performance objectives. Our workplace is a fast-paced and industrious environment. One in which we constantly struggle, like the rest of you, to find some measure of work-life balance.
The difference, I think, is that when we go to work everyday, our objective is not to maximize the number of dollars in our personal bank accounts. Nobody gets into this business for the fortune. There is no fortune for a career civil servant. We make the commitment to serve because we care deeply about social justice. My goal at work is to conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. I am exceedingly aware that my salary comes from tax-payer dollars. I could not go to work if I thought those dollars weren’t benefiting the citizens of this country. And guess what? I pay taxes too.

If you know a Federal scientist, give them a hug. It’s been a really bad week.

From a friend who works for the forest service:

“This week my colleagues and I have had to deal with confusing gag orders and onerous requests for information and justifications of our work. In one case, I was given only half an hour to write statements on a number of pending agreements to explain why they were in the “public interest.” Note, these agreements involve *already allocated funds*, that have gone through *numerous justification and vetting processes already*. I have no idea how these justification requests will be used, but signs out of other agencies are ominous.

All of that said, the *single most pressing issue* for us right now is the blanket hiring freeze. We can muddle through with a hiring freeze on permanent staff, but my work and that of many of my colleagues (and much the functioning of the rest of the Federal system) depends on temporary and seasonal workers.

If this part of the ban is not lifted, then I will not be able to complete a number of projects that are critical to learning how we can best restore arid ecosystems in the Western United States. These lands are under threat from increasing fire frequency, invasive species and other disturbances. These lands support and sustain wildlife, pollinators, rare plants, clean air, clean water, Native American tribes, recreationists, sportsmen and ranchers. These lands are part of our heritage as Americans.

If you would like to help Federal scientists and other Federal employees continue to provide the public service that you have *already paid for* as a tax payer, please consider adding *lifting the ban on temporary and seasonal hiring* to your list of things that you are calling your Senators and Representatives about. Thank you.”

In Defense of Science

Governmental scientists employed at a subset of agencies have been forbidden from presenting their findings to the public. We have drafted the following response for distribution, and encourage other scientists to post it to their websites, when feasible.

Graham Coop, Professor of Evolution and Ecology, UC Davis

Michael B. Eisen, Professor of Molecular and Cell Biology, UC Berkeley

Molly Przeworski, Professor of Biological Sciences, Columbia University

—–

In Defense of Science

We are deeply concerned by the Trump administration’s move to gag scientists working at various governmental agencies. The US government employs scientists working on medicine, public health, agriculture, energy, space, clean water and air, weather, the climate and many other important areas. Their job is to produce data to inform decisions by policymakers, businesses and individuals. We are all best served by allowing these scientists to discuss their findings openly and without the intrusion of politics. Any attack on their ability to do so is an attack on our ability to make informed decisions as individuals, as communities and as a nation.

If you are a government scientist who is blocked from discussing their work, we will share it on your behalf, publicly or with the appropriate recipients. You can email us at USScienceFacts@gmail.com.

If you use this address please use PGP encryption using this PGP public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x52C7139DE0A3D350

Fight anti-science rhetoric by getting scientists to run for office

STEM the Divide is a new initiative by the 314 Action committee (314 are the first three digits of pi, so it’s a committee run by the right kind of nerds). Inspired by committee’s such as Emily’s List, the stated goal of the group is to connect people with science backgrounds to the expertise and funds needed to run a successful campaign.

Intrigued? Read about it over at the Washington Post.

Or consider signing up for 314 Action’s email list, consider running for a state or local office, or donate.

download.png

The battle between global health charities and open access mandates

Global health charities are funding more and more scientific research (as NIH and NSF funding rates are scarily low).

However, one prominent charity, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have an open-access policy stipulating that any research that they fund must be available open-access.

Which conflicts with Science and Nature policy. So at the moment any research funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation cannot be published in two of the top journals for science.

Thoughts?

Read about it here. 

DE068721_1_676x380.jpg