Apparently, that Science cover was pretty bad and plenty of people cared.
I got 75 responses in time to make the above figure (where the width of the blocks are proportional to the number of responses in each category)- 80% said the cover image was either very or kind of poorly chosen and 55% said they cared at least a little bit. The colored “lines” between the two answers depict how frequently two answers were chosen together and clicking the image will make it bigger. Thanks to everyone who gave me their 2 cents – such science. such wow.
Advertisements
I am totally going to steal that graph format! Is that generated in R? (He asked hopefully.)
i’d seen the format before but had no idea what it was called (anyone? bueller?) and had so little data, i did it by hand. however, i feel that there must be a way to do it in R. right? maybe someone out there knows…
This sounds like an excuse for me to spend a day writing a custom function! After I finish nailing down bits of this grant proposal, maybe …
It’s always worrying to me when I review summaries of survey data in which I am one of the respondents, and I can see my own data point. Outlier once again.
sounds like you need to hear this, chris: http://tinyurl.com/ch7exgf
Huh? The url sends me to someone’s blog in dutch with pictures of women’s fashion…?
oops. link fail. corrected above. (but – we’ve definitely exceeded a reasonable effort to reward ratio at this point, so don’t be too disappointed.)
[…] (survey now closed – results are here!) […]