Last week Nature published a short correspondence – and people got really angry. In case you missed it, here is a short summary of events. It started when Nature published an update on their efforts to reduce the gender bias in their publication. This was inexplicably followed by Nature also publishing an ill-conceived short correspondence criticizing their efforts and blaming the inequality on women’s decisions to have children. A number of people responded to the piece (including here, here, and here) and in response, Nature issued a strongly worded mea culpa.
I find that the most frustrating part of this whole fiasco is not that top tier journals sometimes publish things they shouldn’t (I think we already knew that), but that it sidetracks the discussion away from the types of conversations that we should really be having. The underrepresentation of women in top tier journals (as well as math and science fields in general) is a real problem. When half of our brightest minds aren’t being fully represented, we all lose out, regardless of the cause. However, understanding the cause allows us to implement the appropriate solutions.