How to celebrate Valentine’s Day: A note on the Red Queen and maintaining sexual reproduction

This year's Valentine's card of choice

HAPPY VALENTINE’S DAY! As a perpetually single girl this is my favorite holiday of the year. The first and second half of those statements may appear conflicted. However, every year on Valentine’s Day, I send out glorious amounts of Valentine’s to all my single friends (See below for this years!), eat chocolate and drink red wine while ordering myself sexy lingerie on the internet. Yeah, it’s a pretty awesome holiday. This year, one of my favorite evolutionary biologists has upped the excitement by publishing a paper on what conditions favor sex! Perfect for Valentine’s Day!

Why organisms reproduce sexually is one of the great mysteries in evolutionary biology (I’d like to note that here I’m talking about sex in terms of reproduction. It isn’t a mystery to me why organisms copulate, the differences being if that sex comes with offspring while copulation is just good old fashioned fun). There are a number of theoretical reasons that they shouldn’t! One of the strongest arguments was first laid out by John Maynard Smith (1978) who noted that an asexual female can produce twice as many offspring per individual than a sexual female, who wastes half of her effort producing males. This almost immediately results in sexuals being driven to extinction and is termed “the two-fold cost of males.”

Continue reading

Notes From the Field: Going to where the snails are, because they are not going to come to me

Lake Gunn in the fiordlands. Lots of tetraploids and triploids in there!

Hello from the land of Kiwis (the fruit, the bird and the people)! As I mentioned in my last post, I’m a coevolution nut, and down here with all the kiwis there is also an excellent system for studying coevolutionary interactions between hosts and parasites. So during the most frigid part of the terrible winter in Washington state, I take off to the sunshine and summer of the southern hemisphere to do my field work! It’s a rough job, I know.

A little over a quarter century ago, Curt Lively, noted this adorable little New Zealand snail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum) has sexual and asexual forms that coexist at varying frequencies in lakes across New Zealand. This variation suggests that there are some environments where it is advantageous to reproduce asexually and some environments where it is better to be sexual.

From then on P. antipodarumhas become an excellent system to study the evolution and maintanence of sexual reproduction, a long standing debate in evolutionary biology (See Maynard Smith 1978, Williams 1975, Bell 1982, Kondershov 1988).

Continue reading

Coevolutionary Medicine?

ResearchBlogging.orgI’ll admit it. Coevolution turns me on. It gets me up in the morning, is usually the last thing I think about before passing out at night and I’ve made more of a commitment to coevolution than any man I’ve ever been with. I’ve been an evolutionary biologist for the majority of my adult life, I’m working on my third degree in this field and I still scratch my head at people who get their rocks off on just studying one species. Coevolution is fast, it’s dynamic and let’s face it, it’s sexy.

But more than any of the above, coevolution has direct importance in the emerging field of evolutionary medicine. Evolutionary medicine has seen a resurgence in the last few years as some evolutionary biologists have realized that evolution is barely taught in medical school and therefore many doctors are unaware of practices that could be lifesaving, and important to the general population for which they care. With the resurgence has come a number of excellent reviews commenting on the importance of medical research understanding evolutionary principles such as drift, selection and mutation. Here I’d like to touch on just one of the excellent reviews I’ve read recently, a book chapter [PDF] by Michael Antolin from Colorado State University.

Prairie dog

Adorable exotic disease vector

Continue reading